[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gcc
Subject: Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits')
From: Per Bothner <per () bothner ! com>
Date: 1999-09-30 23:11:24
[Download RAW message or body]
Peter Gerwinski <peter@gerwinski.de> writes:
> Then there is no problem. At least not for me; you would
> probably have to change some code in Chill ...
Not me.
> How do we proceed from now? I think it's reasonable
> when you start changing Chill and the GCC backend to use
> BITS_PER_WORD-aligned sets, and then I adapt GPC to that
> backend. Okay?
I have no time or interest in hacking Chill. I don't know of
anyone who does ... All I can do is advise. On the other hand,
if you submit plausible patches that at least compile, it is
likely they'll get accepted!
--
--Per Bothner
bothner@pacbell.net per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/~per/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic