[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freetds
Subject:    Re: [freetds] ODBC unit tests "funccall" and "transaction"
From:       Nick Gorham <nick () lurcher ! org>
Date:       2004-01-11 11:49:17
Message-ID: 4001383D.2060800 () lurcher ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Frediano Ziglio wrote:

>Il dom, 2004-01-11 alle 01:25, Castellano, Nicholas ha scritto:
>  
>
>>>From: James K. Lowden [mailto:jklowden@schemamania.org] 
>>>Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:16 AM
>>>To: FreeTDS Development Group
>>>Subject: Re: [freetds] ODBC unit tests "funccall" and "transaction"
>>>
>>>My last information was that your test boxes run 
>>>unixODBC-2.2.6, and Freddy tells us unixODBC-2.2.7 is just 
>>>broken, and not only for FreeTDS. 
>>>Is that accurate?  
>>>      
>>>
>>Yes, the 0.62 release notes should definitely say to use 2.2.6 and avoid
>>2.2.7.  I still have 2.0.11 on the Digital UNIX system, so that machine
>>doesn't pass the "transaction" test, but I'm confident that it would if I
>>upgraded to 2.2.6 (which I'm currently not at liberty to do).
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Yesterday Nick Gorham replied to my mail and confirm the problem. 2.2.7
>is quite broken... Nick is working to fix the problem and release a
>2.2.8 version ASAP. It give to me a patch (already in unixODBC CVS) but
>it do not fix all problems. I tried also to update our
>SQLExecute/SQLExecDirect to return correct SQL_NO_DATA value (this
>should be correct result is no data) however more tests fails :( so I
>leave the code as is (even if do not respect specification in this
>direction)... 
>
>  
>
Hang on, I didn't say that at all, SQLMoreResults is broken, but AFAIK 
nothing else. I said that I don't want to release 2.2.8 if I can avoid 
it, with only one bug fix.

If you know of any other problems in the DM please let me know.

-- 
Nick

I have a red sign on my door.
It says "If this sign is blue, you're moving too fast."



_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
FreeTDS@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]