From freetds Sun Jan 11 11:49:17 2004 From: Nick Gorham Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:49:17 +0000 To: freetds Subject: Re: [freetds] ODBC unit tests "funccall" and "transaction" Message-Id: <4001383D.2060800 () lurcher ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=freetds&m=107382210421038 Frediano Ziglio wrote: >Il dom, 2004-01-11 alle 01:25, Castellano, Nicholas ha scritto: > > >>>From: James K. Lowden [mailto:jklowden@schemamania.org] >>>Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:16 AM >>>To: FreeTDS Development Group >>>Subject: Re: [freetds] ODBC unit tests "funccall" and "transaction" >>> >>>My last information was that your test boxes run >>>unixODBC-2.2.6, and Freddy tells us unixODBC-2.2.7 is just >>>broken, and not only for FreeTDS. >>>Is that accurate? >>> >>> >>Yes, the 0.62 release notes should definitely say to use 2.2.6 and avoid >>2.2.7. I still have 2.0.11 on the Digital UNIX system, so that machine >>doesn't pass the "transaction" test, but I'm confident that it would if I >>upgraded to 2.2.6 (which I'm currently not at liberty to do). >> >> >> > >Yesterday Nick Gorham replied to my mail and confirm the problem. 2.2.7 >is quite broken... Nick is working to fix the problem and release a >2.2.8 version ASAP. It give to me a patch (already in unixODBC CVS) but >it do not fix all problems. I tried also to update our >SQLExecute/SQLExecDirect to return correct SQL_NO_DATA value (this >should be correct result is no data) however more tests fails :( so I >leave the code as is (even if do not respect specification in this >direction)... > > > Hang on, I didn't say that at all, SQLMoreResults is broken, but AFAIK nothing else. I said that I don't want to release 2.2.8 if I can avoid it, with only one bug fix. If you know of any other problems in the DM please let me know. -- Nick I have a red sign on my door. It says "If this sign is blue, you're moving too fast." _______________________________________________ FreeTDS mailing list FreeTDS@lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds