[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       firewalls-gc
Subject:    RE: [NTSEC] ActiveX, MSIE and Quicken
From:       "A._Ömer_Köker" <omer () superonline ! net>
Date:       1997-02-10 23:01:43
[Download RAW message or body]


What about material coming in over email ?  Such as Netscape
In-Box-Direct and or even Pointcast and similiars?
Can you filter thousands of e-mail messages?  Privacy issues? 

Regards,
A. Omer Koker.


>----------
>From: 	Jerry Mendes[SMTP:mendes@garnet.berkeley.edu]
>Sent: 	08 Şubat 1997 Cumartesi 13:05
>To: 	Russ
>Cc: 	firewalls@GreatCircle.COM
>Subject: 	RE: [NTSEC] ActiveX, MSIE and Quicken
>
>Presumably, one answer is for the firewall companies to write additional
>application layer filters for port 80, looking for ActiveX or Java
>downloads.  This would make configuration of the firewall a bit more
>complex.  Don't know if any of 'em are considering this yet.  Anyone have
>any scoop on this?
>
>Jerry Mendes, Principal Consultant
>DataComm Insights
>150 Seminary Drive
>Mill Valley, California  94941
>
>Voice:  415-381-5500
>FAX:    415-381-5502
>Email:  mendes@garnet.berkeley.edu
>
>At 11:40 PM 2/1/97 -0500, Russ wrote:
>>To try and keep this on a Firewalls vein. The tunneling of anything over
>>HTTP is, in my opinion, the crappy technology. That goes for Java
>>applets or certificate authentication for that matter. I don't like the
>>idea of combining diverse tasks within a single channel if its possible
>>to avoid it, and it is possible, so the only reason its not being done
>>is to USURP FIREWALLS.
>____________________________________________________________________________
>_______
>Jerry Mendes, Principal Consultant              Voice:   (415) 381-5500
>DataComm Insights                               FAX:     (415) 381-5502
>150 Seminary Drive                              Email:
>mendes@garnet.berkeley.edu
>Mill Valley, California  94941
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]