[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: fedora-devel-list
Subject: Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)
From: Geraldo_Simião_Kutz <geraldo.simiao.kutz () gmail ! com>
Date: 2023-03-03 12:06:20
Message-ID: CAPoqUFeUFO9=voPBN8LSxim5jzFfAELRnixgLCRAEZjF-tac9Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Testing F38 KDE spin today, I see this:
Delta RPMs reduced 235.2 MB to 23.8 MB (89.9%)
So, it seems we do still have some cornercases when deltaRPM shows its
value.
But, ok, In agree that in most cases it's irrelevant this days.
+1 for dropping deltarpm
geraldosimiao
Em ter., 21 de fev. de 2023 Ã s 17:48, Matthew Miller <
mattdm@fedoraproject.org> escreveu:
> I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a
> priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere...
>
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JYKVELSBJQMEK6KEFXG354ZDZDDX4C5G/#RLEUYSWOUVUS53YAP7WQQNN7HNEBIC4E
>
> ... and that ticket hasn't moved, because fixing it isn't trivial.
>
>
> What we're doing now — as has been the case for several years, already
> noted
> in the previous discussion — has very little end-user value. Also as noted
> in that thread (as in the ticket)... that's unfortunate, because it did
> bring some real benefits (and could possibly do even more.)
>
> But, I think it's time to move on. We have ostree and various
> container-delta approaches. We should focus on those — and give DeltaRPMs a
> sad, fond farewell.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm@fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Testing F38 KDE spin today, I see \
this:</div><div>Delta RPMs reduced 235.2 MB to 23.8 MB \
(89.9%)</div><div><br></div><div>So, it seems we do still have some cornercases when \
deltaRPM shows its value.</div><div><br></div><div>But, ok, In agree that in most \
cases it's irrelevant this days.</div><div>+1 for dropping \
deltarpm</div><div><br></div><div>geraldosimiao<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Em ter., 21 de fev. de 2023 Ã s \
17:48, Matthew Miller <<a \
href="mailto:mattdm@fedoraproject.org">mattdm@fedoraproject.org</a>> \
escreveu:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I was asked to weigh \
in on <a href="https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215</a> as a<br> priority. Last time \
we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere...<br> <br>
<a href="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JYKVELSBJQMEK6KEFXG354ZDZDDX4C5G/#RLEUYSWOUVUS53YAP7WQQNN7HNEBIC4E" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@l \
ists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JYKVELSBJQMEK6KEFXG354ZDZDDX4C5G/#RLEUYSWOUVUS53YAP7WQQNN7HNEBIC4E</a><br>
<br>
... and that ticket hasn't moved, because fixing it isn't trivial.<br>
<br>
<br>
What we're doing now — as has been the case for several years, already \
noted<br> in the previous discussion — has very little end-user value. Also as \
noted<br> in that thread (as in the ticket)... that's unfortunate, because it \
did<br> bring some real benefits (and could possibly do even more.)<br>
<br>
But, I think it's time to move on. We have ostree and various<br>
container-delta approaches. We should focus on those — and give DeltaRPMs a<br>
sad, fond farewell.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Matthew Miller<br>
<<a href="mailto:mattdm@fedoraproject.org" \
target="_blank">mattdm@fedoraproject.org</a>><br> Fedora Project Leader<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
devel mailing list -- <a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org" \
target="_blank">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br> To unsubscribe send an email to \
<a href="mailto:devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org" \
target="_blank">devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br> Fedora Code of Conduct: \
<a href="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/</a><br>
List Guidelines: <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines</a><br>
List Archives: <a href="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
Do not reply to spam, report it: <a \
href="https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue</a><br> \
</blockquote></div>
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic