[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for
From:       Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer () gmail ! com>
Date:       2019-11-14 1:48:50
Message-ID: c468ce0f-0927-da2c-f16e-f153da02fbf4 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/12/19 2:21 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> However, I believe there's a third option here. It could be as simple as
> providing a python3-static in addition, and NOT using `alternatives`.


Is that an option, though?  From the discussion, I was under the 
impression that static vs dynamic python affected whether or not python 
extensions need to be linked to libpython*.*m.so.  I'm unclear on that, 
though because I see some modules today that aren't linked to that 
library, though most of the ones I checked are.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]