[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
From:       Sandro Mani <manisandro () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-06-16 7:35:31
Message-ID: 557FD1C3.9060003 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]



On 16.06.2015 00:30, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> On 06/14/2015 03:02 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> On 14.06.2015 16:28, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>> Rules to generate such requires/provides:
>>> * Provides: if the path of the library starts with $MPI_LIB, append
>>> the (openmpi) resp (mpich) to the provides string
>>> * Requires: if the path of the scanned object starts with $MPI_LIB and
>>> the required library exists in $MPI_LIB, add (openmpi) resp (mpich) to
>>> the requires string
>>>
>>> Overriding the find-requires.sh could be done with a
>>> %{?openmpi_package_header}.
>> Concrete examples:
>>
>> https://smani.fedorapeople.org/mpi-find-provides
>> https://smani.fedorapeople.org/mpi-find-requires
>>
>> Konsole output
>> $ echo -e
>> "/usr/lib64/openmpi/lib/libnglib-5.3.1.so\n/usr/lib64/libnglib-5.3.1.so"
>> | ./mpi-find-provides
>> libnglib-5.3.1.so()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
>> libnglib-5.3.1.so()(64bit)
>
> Sounds even better... although your links give HTTP 403.
Thanks for the feedback. Permissions fixed, sorry about that.

To discuss this further, should it be drafted as a Change and go to 
FESCO, or rather filed as an FPC ticket?

Thanks,
Sandro
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]