[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: GRUB 2 in Ubuntu 9.10
From:       Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-06-10 16:55:21
Message-ID: 645d17210906100955ma8ff326i70198812367194c1 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2009/6/10 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
>
>> If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with grub
>> "legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I
>> fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody really took
>> ownership and vendors carried their own individual patches wich doesn't
>> really work well with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra.
>
> For better or worse, we are effectively running a grub fork, and I see
> very little desire to change that...

Is extlinux worth considering as a replacement? I know Foresight has
gone that road.

Jonathan (who knows nothing about bootloaders).

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]