[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: GRUB 2 in Ubuntu 9.10
From:       Matthias Clasen <mclasen () redhat ! com>
Date:       2009-06-10 16:50:46
Message-ID: 1244652646.2245.22.camel () localhost ! localdomain
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:

> If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with grub 
> "legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I 
> fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody really took 
> ownership and vendors carried their own individual patches wich doesn't 
> really work well with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra.

For better or worse, we are effectively running a grub fork, and I see
very little desire to change that...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]