[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Re: SPF
From: Dominik Ruf <dominik-exim-users () dodolin ! de>
Date: 2004-01-30 16:30:22
Message-ID: 20040130163021.GA15293 () dodolin ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
* Chris Edwards <chris@eng.gla.ac.uk> [2004-01-30 17:03]:
> Its simply an over-complicated form of whitelisting.
IMHO not. Whitelisting happens at the receiver side whereas
SPF gives this kind of control back to the sender.
> In the real world, a significant proportion of bona-fide mail is sent by
> SMTP clients that could never be "designated senders" for the envelope
> sender domain they use.
Then this sender domain will publish no SPF records at all or
"suitable" SPF records.
BTW: I find this topic (SPF) kinda offtopic for the exim-users
list as long as we're not directly discussing the integration of
SPF into Exim. Therefor, I'm setting the Reply-To Header to me.
Dominik
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at \
http://www.exim.org/ ##
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic