[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       dri-devel
Subject:    Re: RFC: libdrm repo
From:       Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-11-30 1:23:11
Message-ID: 91705d080911291723q51f369efgad83afc3fac078fe () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:03 PM, vehemens <vehemens@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:36:51 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:54:31 vehemens wrote:
>> > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>> > > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote:
>> > >
>> > > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > > Your missing the point of using a development structure which
>> > > > supports collobration.
>> > >
>> > > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > > The difference is that you are the only one doing the work now.
>> > >
>> > > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > > Again, your missing the point of using a development structure which
>> > > > supports collobration.
>> > >
>> > > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > > It hasn't moved "... well beyond what was in drm git."   If you
>> > > > believe otherwise, your only fooling yourself.
>> > >
>> > > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > > See above comments.
>> > >
>> > > Yes, you have made it abundantly clear that you are in favor of having
>> > > a centralized repository for all DRM development.  The fact is, that's
>> > > not happening now and is not going to happen.  That used to be the
>> > > case, but the linux DRM developers did not see an advantage to that for
>> > > themselves, and though rnoland was unhappy with the decision (because
>> > > it made his job harder), the linux DRM developers did what they felt
>> > > was best.
>> >
>> > You assuming what what good for Linux for a developer, is also good for a
>> > BSD developer.  As for making rnoland's job harder, it was his choice.
>>
>> Nice try, but I am making no such assumptions.  It was not rnoland's choice
>> to stop having the linux DRM developers stop using a centralized repository
>> for all DRM code.  He was quite clearly opposed to it and did not consider
>> it a good choice.
>
> You missing the point as is rnoland.  Just because the linux DRM  developers
> stopped using a centralized repository, didn't mean FreeBSD shouldn't as the
> intial integration work would be still shared reducing the burden on any one
> person.  The approach taken by rnoland however was to shift all the work to
> himself.

Sorry to stick myself into this conversation, but isn't the freebsd
tree now your centralized repository? Can't you just clone that and
continue as before?

--
Dan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]