[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: Not depending on shlibs because of plugins?
From:       Christoph Berg <myon () debian ! org>
Date:       2007-01-05 17:55:12
Message-ID: 20070105175512.GF6180 () df7cb ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Re: Mattia Dongili 2007-01-05 <20070105174804.GG13533@inferi.kami.home>
> > Is it in this case ok if I replace ',' by '|' there? This would allow
> > the user to really choose what database backend he wants.
> 
> Yes, why not? does yada handles gracefully the absence of a library (eg.
> if incorrectly configured or such)?

Yes, it returns an error. (I.e. it doesn't segfault or something.)

> If so did you consider:
> 
> Depends: A | B | C
> Reccomends/Suggests: A, B, C
> 
> would that work?

It wouldn't change the fact that I'm formally breaking policy. (Or
rather, the question *if* I would break it.)

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]