[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: darcs-users
Subject: [darcs-users] first usage impressions.
From: Thomas Zander <TZander () factotummedia ! nl>
Date: 2004-12-04 13:04:57
Message-ID: 20041204130457.GA32647 () factotummedia ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi,
I just downloaded darcs (stable) and started playing with it.
My first impression is that some beginners mistakes on my side would
have been avoided if darcs was a bit more chatty. If it commented
more on obvious pittfalls.
For instance; " darcs remove README" gave no reply, and I was wondering
why the file still existed on the filesystem. A friendly person on IRC
pointed out that a 'rm README' would have implied the 'darcs remove'.
I suggest to either print an error saying the file still exists, or
print the current status. Something like:
"Removed foo from darcs, future changes will not be recorded"
naturally; this warning should not be printed if the file is already
removed from the filesystem.
While working on the above problem I also did a second remove. I typed:
"darcs remove README" a second time and was presented with an error:
darcs failed: Can't remove README
This is understandable; but a nice "README is not added" or similar
would help a LOT
What do others think? Would it be worthwile to make darcs provide
a tad more text pointing the user in the right directions?
Another situation:
doing a "darcs pull ../../foo" gave me a "No changes" while pointing
to the same 'foo' using an absolute path did notice the changes. Is
this a bug?
--
Thomas Zander
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic