[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       crux
Subject:    Re: Get unofficial with 'ports -u'
From:       TobbY Nowack <TobbY () Indiancoder ! de>
Date:       2002-08-01 7:34:20
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 31 July 2002 18:15, you wrote:
> > PS: Per will update the ports package to work with multiple supfiles when
> > he's back from holidays around August 12. He'll happily accept a patch
> > for the ports command. I'm sure someone finds a more beautiful solution
> > than my hack... ports -d already supports unofficial.
>
> Is there also a solution for the symlink problem in pkgmk accepted von Per?
>
> TobbY
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9SOR8ZAM5y/mNFN8RAol9AKDT59hHyb+o8KtIruu/C2ipeS40OwCeNUQW
wFX5nM52HavbmFf22yV3CWQ=
=nMqC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]