[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-nsp
Subject:    Re: [c-nsp] Juniper M320 vs. 7600/SUP320-3BXL and WS-X6148A-GE-TX
From:       BALLA Attila <atis () eik ! bme ! hu>
Date:       2010-07-30 9:22:21
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.1007301118450.21483 () mono
[Download RAW message or body]

what about asr9k with low-queue cards? its price and performance is 
reasonable as well.

br, A.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Chris Hale wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Looking for options to our next upgrade from our 7200VXR platform.
> Someone suggested 7600 and the WS-X6148A-GE-TX cards with a
> SUP720-3BXL.  We're doing BGP (4-5 full iBGP peers, 13 external peers
> (3 upstream, 10 downstream), all full routes), dot1q trunks, EoMPLS
> with L2VPNs.  We will most likely do dot1q trunks to our agg switches
> at our other POPs with MPLS and L2VPNs being started/terminated on
> dot1q trunks. We're also looking to roll out IPv6 services in the next
> few months.
>
> Our options we're looking at are a Juniper M320 w/RE-1600 and SFP PIC
> (PB-4GE-SFP).
>
> I don't necessarily need the port density of the 48-port Cisco card,
> but it's always nice to have.  Any reason not to start with the 6148A
> card and upgrade to the OSM cards, etc.,
>
> I'm open to suggestions, opinions, etc, and especially any gotchas
> with either platform.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]