[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: calligra-devel
Subject: Re: Re: How to deal with typo "2" instead of "2.1" for "GNU Lesser General Public" in headers?
From: "C. Boemann" <cbo () boemann ! dk>
Date: 2015-01-04 18:24:27
Message-ID: 5735218.TxdosJKpRU () flapper
[Download RAW message or body]
I'm normally really cautious about such changes but yes since 2.0 doesn't
exist I'd say it's a no-brainer that it's just a typo. I for one might have
made that typo many times myself
so please go ahead
On Sunday 04 January 2015 19:18:10 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > can it be assumed (and should we) that all contributors actually agreed to
> > the "2.1" version of the "Lesser" given there is no "2" version?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Especially as at least all files I checked also contain "or (at your
> > option) any later version.", where "2.1" would be a theoretical later
> > version of "2"?
> >
> > To be on the really safe side I guess one would need to get all
> > contributors explicitely agree to the correct version. But pragmatically
> > I would just assume people very much were in agreement with 2.1, and this
> > can be considered just a typo.
> >
> > So would anyone strongly advise against simply applying a patch to all
> > those license headers and change the "2" to "2.1"?
>
> Not me.
>
> Boud
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic