From calligra-devel Sun Jan 04 18:24:27 2015 From: "C. Boemann" Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 18:24:27 +0000 To: calligra-devel Subject: Re: Re: How to deal with typo "2" instead of "2.1" for "GNU Lesser General Public" in headers? Message-Id: <5735218.TxdosJKpRU () flapper> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=calligra-devel&m=142039588020926 I'm normally really cautious about such changes but yes since 2.0 doesn't exist I'd say it's a no-brainer that it's just a typo. I for one might have made that typo many times myself so please go ahead On Sunday 04 January 2015 19:18:10 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > can it be assumed (and should we) that all contributors actually agreed to > > the "2.1" version of the "Lesser" given there is no "2" version? > > Yes. > > > Especially as at least all files I checked also contain "or (at your > > option) any later version.", where "2.1" would be a theoretical later > > version of "2"? > > > > To be on the really safe side I guess one would need to get all > > contributors explicitely agree to the correct version. But pragmatically > > I would just assume people very much were in agreement with 2.1, and this > > can be considered just a typo. > > > > So would anyone strongly advise against simply applying a patch to all > > those license headers and change the "2" to "2.1"? > > Not me. > > Boud > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra- _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel