[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: [PATCH][nproc --all --ignore]
From:       Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2018-07-06 14:20:56
Message-ID: CAK1hOcMHrmbjDgOjduirpvVfj2b+Hn9B+DURVJuv=2-+jHF9Kw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Applied, thanks

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:11 AM, haroon maqsood <maqsood3525@live.com> wrote:
> ________________________________
> From: haroon maqsood <maqsood3525@live.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 9:08 PM
> To: busybox@busybox.net
> Subject: [PATCH][nproc --all --ignore]
>
>
> Hi PFA the my attempt at --all --ignore implementation for nproc.
>
> i read that a good applet would make long options configurable, but in this
>
> case i found at least that it would be simpler to just add them both.
>
> please let me know what you think.
>
> i have a question about  /sys/devices/system/cpu/
>
> can /proc/cpuinfo be used ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Haroon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox@busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]