[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    [BusyBox] Re: busybox insmod problem
From:       "Eric Spakman" <E.Spakman () inter ! nl ! net>
Date:       2004-01-31 18:17:51
Message-ID: 401BFF5F.8135.103AE8 () localhost
[Download RAW message or body]

Glen,

I don't think it's a GPLONLY problem, the crypto modules are part of 
the standard 2.4.24 kernel and are GPL signed (according to the 
source). The insmod from modutils-2.4.21 doesn't complain about that 
also.

Relevant part of my busybox config:
# Linux Module Utilities
#
CONFIG_INSMOD=y
# CONFIG_FEATURE_2_2_MODULES is not set
CONFIG_FEATURE_2_4_MODULES=y
# CONFIG_FEATURE_2_6_MODULES is not set
# CONFIG_FEATURE_INSMOD_VERSION_CHECKING is not set
# CONFIG_FEATURE_INSMOD_KSYMOOPS_SYMBOLS is not set
# CONFIG_FEATURE_INSMOD_LOADINKMEM is not set
# CONFIG_FEATURE_INSMOD_LOAD_MAP is not set
CONFIG_LSMOD=y
CONFIG_FEATURE_QUERY_MODULE_INTERFACE=y
# CONFIG_MODPROBE is not set
CONFIG_RMMOD=y
# CONFIG_FEATURE_CHECK_TAINTED_MODULE is not set

Regards,
Eric Spakman



"Eric Spakman" <E.Spakman at inter.nl.net> wrote:

> The crypto core is loaded and the /proc/crypto interface is also 
> available. Using insmod from modutils-2.4.21 does work, so it must 
be 
> something with busybox insmod.

Could it be something to do with GPLONLY symbols ?

(just guessing)

Glenn





_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@mail.busybox.net
http://codepoet.org/mailman/listinfo/busybox


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]