[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: autoconf
Subject: Re: Why I am happy to dump gzip for xz
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier () gentoo ! org>
Date: 2012-03-06 19:11:27
Message-ID: 201203061411.30027.vapier () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 12:03:43 Jim Meyering wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 March 2012 04:57:27 Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> Why I am happy to dump gzip for xz:
> >> - xz decompresses more quickly
> >
> > is that true ? i thought last i looked, they were close, but gzip was
> > consistently slightly faster. maybe if the bottleneck is more I/O than
> > CPU/memory, xz would win ?
>
> Even back when the program was named lzma, it was always
> much more efficient at decompressing than *bzip2*:
sure, i agree completely that xz over bzip2 is a no brainer in pretty much
every way possible :)
-mike
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic