[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apr-dev
Subject:    Re: svn commit: r396812 -	/apr/apr-util/branches/1.2.x/dbd/apr_dbd_pgsql.c
From:       "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe () rowe-clan ! net>
Date:       2006-04-25 20:04:47
Message-ID: 444E80DF.2020406 () rowe-clan ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 07:58 -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> 
>>if you're merging a revision from trunk to a branch (or
>>vice-versa for that matter)
> 
> Just occurred to me - if there is a backport from the trunk to a branch
> that isn't a straight merge (i.e. the patch needs adjusting in order to
> work), do I still comment it as "Merge revision...", or do I comment is
> as "Backport such and such fix from trunk"?

It's nice to comment 'rework commit 395999 from trunk to apply clean.'
It helps to track providence.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]