[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: amarok-devel
Subject: RE: C++11
From: Patrick von Reth <patrick () von-reth ! de>
Date: 2013-05-08 15:14:05
Message-ID: DUB102-W493ADF0D65323ADA18D832F8BB0 () phx ! gbl
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
For the official builds we are still using gcc 4.4.7 and we probably won't switch to \
4.8 before we switch to qt5.But for a amarok only build, I already did some testing \
and got a working build with gcc 4.8.For msvc, we are currently using msvc10, and \
won't switch to msvc12(which has c++11 support) before we switch to qt5. Cheers
Patrick
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:51:28 +0200
> From: edward.hades@gmail.com
> To: amarok-devel@kde.org
> Subject: Re: C++11
>
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> > I'd really like to start using some C++11 features in Amarok. It has been
> > argued that only few compilers support all of C++11's features at this
> > point, and that we therefore couldn't use C++11.
>
> I support going to C++11. Probably the best people to ask about compiler
> support are our packagers, since it is them, who'll be "enjoying" all
> the potential problems.
>
> Also, I believe a multi-platform buildbot would help a lot at this
> point. We could set it up so that it builds Amarok with a bunch of
> popular GCC and CLang versions to make sure we break the build on as few
> systems as possible.
>
> --
> Edward "Hades" Toroshchin
> dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>For the official builds we are still using gcc \
4.4.7 and we probably won't switch to 4.8 before we switch to qt5.<div>But for a \
amarok only build, I already did some testing and got a working build with gcc \
4.8.</div><div>For msvc, we are currently using msvc10, and won't switch to \
msvc12(which has c++11 support) before we switch to \
qt5.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div><br></div><div>Patrick<br><br><div><div \
id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:51:28 +0200<br>> \
From: edward.hades@gmail.com<br>> To: amarok-devel@kde.org<br>> Subject: Re: \
C++11<br>> <br>> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200, Mark Kretschmann \
wrote:<br>> > I'd really like to start using some C++11 features in Amarok. It \
has been<br>> > argued that only few compilers support all of C++11's features \
at this<br>> > point, and that we therefore couldn't use C++11.<br>> \
<br>> I support going to C++11. Probably the best people to ask about \
compiler<br>> support are our packagers, since it is them, who'll be "enjoying" \
all<br>> the potential problems.<br>> <br>> Also, I believe a multi-platform \
buildbot would help a lot at this<br>> point. We could set it up so that it builds \
Amarok with a bunch of<br>> popular GCC and CLang versions to make sure we break \
the build on as few<br>> systems as possible.<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Edward \
"Hades" Toroshchin<br>> dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org<br>> \
_______________________________________________<br>> Amarok-devel mailing \
list<br>> Amarok-devel@kde.org<br>> \
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel<br></div></div> \
</div></body> </html>
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic