--===============1075142096471820937== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_e696fe73-75a7-4880-97e9-33f182c894ab_" --_e696fe73-75a7-4880-97e9-33f182c894ab_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For the official builds we are still using gcc 4.4.7 and we probably won't = switch to 4.8 before we switch to qt5.But for a amarok only build=2C I alre= ady did some testing and got a working build with gcc 4.8.For msvc=2C we ar= e currently using msvc10=2C and won't switch to msvc12(which has c++11 supp= ort) before we switch to qt5. Cheers Patrick > Date: Wed=2C 8 May 2013 15:51:28 +0200 > From: edward.hades@gmail.com > To: amarok-devel@kde.org > Subject: Re: C++11 >=20 > On Wed=2C May 08=2C 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200=2C Mark Kretschmann wrote: > > I'd really like to start using some C++11 features in Amarok. It has be= en > > argued that only few compilers support all of C++11's features at this > > point=2C and that we therefore couldn't use C++11. >=20 > I support going to C++11. Probably the best people to ask about compiler > support are our packagers=2C since it is them=2C who'll be "enjoying" all > the potential problems. >=20 > Also=2C I believe a multi-platform buildbot would help a lot at this > point. We could set it up so that it builds Amarok with a bunch of > popular GCC and CLang versions to make sure we break the build on as few > systems as possible. >=20 > --=20 > Edward "Hades" Toroshchin > dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org > _______________________________________________ > Amarok-devel mailing list > Amarok-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel = --_e696fe73-75a7-4880-97e9-33f182c894ab_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For the official builds we are s= till using gcc 4.4.7 and we probably won't switch to 4.8 before we switch t= o qt5.
But for a amarok only build=2C I already did some testing and go= t a working build with gcc 4.8.
For msvc=2C we are currently usin= g msvc10=2C and won't switch to msvc12(which has c++11 support) before we s= witch to qt5.

Cheers

Patr= ick

>=3B Date: Wed=2C 8= May 2013 15:51:28 +0200
>=3B From: edward.hades@gmail.com
>=3B T= o: amarok-devel@kde.org
>=3B Subject: Re: C++11
>=3B
>=3B O= n Wed=2C May 08=2C 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200=2C Mark Kretschmann wrote:
&= gt=3B >=3B I'd really like to start using some C++11 features in Amarok. = It has been
>=3B >=3B argued that only few compilers support all of = C++11's features at this
>=3B >=3B point=2C and that we therefore co= uldn't use C++11.
>=3B
>=3B I support going to C++11. Probably t= he best people to ask about compiler
>=3B support are our packagers=2C= since it is them=2C who'll be "enjoying" all
>=3B the potential probl= ems.
>=3B
>=3B Also=2C I believe a multi-platform buildbot would= help a lot at this
>=3B point. We could set it up so that it builds A= marok with a bunch of
>=3B popular GCC and CLang versions to make sure= we break the build on as few
>=3B systems as possible.
>=3B
= >=3B --
>=3B Edward "Hades" Toroshchin
>=3B dr_lepper on irc.f= reenode.org
>=3B _______________________________________________
&g= t=3B Amarok-devel mailing list
>=3B Amarok-devel@kde.org
>=3B htt= ps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
=
= --_e696fe73-75a7-4880-97e9-33f182c894ab_-- --===============1075142096471820937== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel --===============1075142096471820937==--