[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Playlist Navigation (was: Queue Manager)
From:       "Marius" <furt () gmx ! de>
Date:       2010-02-09 14:24:28
Message-ID: 20100209142428.265510 () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

> Datum: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:06:30 +0100
> Von: Bart Cerneels <bart.cerneels@kde.org>

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 13:38, Marius <furt@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> So the conclusion is we don't need a queue manager. Congrats, we
> understood that more then a year ago.

As I have mentioned several times before, I did not follow earlier discussions, \
because I am subscribed to this list for about one week. And all feedback I got for \
the queue manager was "we don't need one, feature creep." But that doesn't matter, \
now I understand I can live without one.

> 
> Now about that playlists browser: we have one in the "Saved Playlists"
> category. What is missing from it to make your workflow (that now
> requires a queue-manager) possible? Or wrong to prevent that.

As I also mentioned before, it has several disadvantages in my opinion:
- you can't drop tracks directly from the collection
- you can't easily drop tracks between different playlists. In the worst case, you \
have to scroll through several hundred lines while dragging to find the right place \
                to drop.
- you can't create playlists from within the playlist browser, just save the whole \
                current playlist.
- you can't easily play a whole playlist in random mode and at the same time consider \
wishes from listeners (would require a queue manager or a dynamic playlist which is \
feeded by a saved playlist)

-Marius
-- 
NEU: Mit GMX DSL über 1000,- ¿ sparen!
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]