> Datum: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:06:30 +0100 > Von: Bart Cerneels > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 13:38, Marius wrote: > > So the conclusion is we don't need a queue manager. Congrats, we > understood that more then a year ago. As I have mentioned several times before, I did not follow earlier discussions, because I am subscribed to this list for about one week. And all feedback I got for the queue manager was "we don't need one, feature creep." But that doesn't matter, now I understand I can live without one. > > Now about that playlists browser: we have one in the "Saved Playlists" > category. What is missing from it to make your workflow (that now > requires a queue-manager) possible? Or wrong to prevent that. As I also mentioned before, it has several disadvantages in my opinion: - you can't drop tracks directly from the collection - you can't easily drop tracks between different playlists. In the worst case, you have to scroll through several hundred lines while dragging to find the right place to drop. - you can't create playlists from within the playlist browser, just save the whole current playlist. - you can't easily play a whole playlist in random mode and at the same time consider wishes from listeners (would require a queue manager or a dynamic playlist which is feeded by a saved playlist) -Marius -- NEU: Mit GMX DSL über 1000,- ¿ sparen! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel