[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: [Qtscript-bindings] long qtscript binding load times: easily
From:       "Richard Moore" <richmoore44 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-09-10 16:35:31
Message-ID: 5491a5150809100935v4ed3518ve2882742e957cc89 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 9/10/08, Ian Monroe <ian@monroe.nu> wrote:
> I was thinking of maybe a combination of breaking up the modules into
> smaller ones and disabling classes that don't sound useful for Amarok
> scripts (and then re-enable them on-request).
>
> Other solutions? How much should I break up? I could potentially have
> a "each class has its own module." Would this incur a lot of overhead
> loading all these modules or does it not make much difference?

Kent and I discussed this at Akademy, I believe he's already got some
code for a version of the generator that creates bindings that do on
demand loading to remove the overhead.

Cheers

Rich.
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]