[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Why do we use WMA instead of ASF?
From:       Jeff Mitchell <kde-dev () emailgoeshere ! com>
Date:       2007-11-19 23:51:04
Message-ID: 200711191851.04894.kde-dev () emailgoeshere ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 19 November 2007, Harald Sitter wrote:
> Am Montag 19 November 2007 18:38:49 schrieb Martin Aumueller:
> > We use wma because it was named that we when we originally retrieved it
> > from upstream.
> >
> > It should not be difficult at all to change that. But we should probably
> > only maintain one copy of the taglib extension code for Amarok 2.0 and
> > 1.4, as having cmake and automake build instructions in the same source
> > tree is perfectly possible. Otherwise we would have to keep 2 copies up
> > to date.
>
> I'm not all for renaming the extension in 1.4 anyway.
>
> See http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stable#Adjective for the reason of this.

No extension renaming is necessary.
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]