[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Why do we use WMA instead of ASF?
From:       Harald Sitter <harald () getamarok ! com>
Date:       2007-11-19 20:39:57
Message-ID: 200711192140.03144.harald () getamarok ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Montag 19 November 2007 21:10:21 schrieb Ian Monroe:
> I just find them calling it "ASF" puzzling though. :)

Well, ASF is a container nowadays, so it makes sense to call the extension ASF 
and not WMA since it's probably able to read ASF, WMA and WMV tags. After 
all, the ogg-vorbis extension is OGG and not Vorbis.

-- 
Harald Sitter
Amarok team        Project Manager         Mail: harald@getamarok.com
amarok.kde.org     Good news everyone!     Jabber: apachelogger@kdetalk.net

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]