[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Why do we use WMA instead of ASF?
From:       Harald Sitter <harald () getamarok ! com>
Date:       2007-11-19 18:02:34
Message-ID: 200711191902.38477.harald () getamarok ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Montag 19 November 2007 18:38:49 schrieb Martin Aumueller:
> We use wma because it was named that we when we originally retrieved it
> from upstream.
>
> It should not be difficult at all to change that. But we should probably
> only maintain one copy of the taglib extension code for Amarok 2.0 and 1.4,
> as having cmake and automake build instructions in the same source tree is
> perfectly possible. Otherwise we would have to keep 2 copies up to date.

I'm not all for renaming the extension in 1.4 anyway. 

See http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stable#Adjective for the reason of this.

-- 
Harald Sitter
Amarok team        Project Manager         Mail: harald@getamarok.com
amarok.kde.org     Good news everyone!     Jabber: apachelogger@kdetalk.net

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]