[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Why do we use WMA instead of ASF?
From:       Martin Aumueller <aumuell () reserv ! at>
Date:       2007-11-19 17:38:49
Message-ID: 200711191838.49624.aumuell () reserv ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

We use wma because it was named that we when we originally retrieved it from 
upstream.

It should not be difficult at all to change that. But we should probably only 
maintain one copy of the taglib extension code for Amarok 2.0 and 1.4, as 
having cmake and automake build instructions in the same source tree is 
perfectly possible. Otherwise we would have to keep 2 copies up to date.

Martin

On Monday 19 November 2007, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> In our extra taglib code we use WMA instead of ASF, which is what
> upstream uses.  I need to sync the two to fix some bugs (which I want to
> do before 1.4.8).
>
> Is there a reason we are using WMA?  It shouldn't be too difficult to
> change things.  But I don't know why it's different in the first place.
>
> --Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]