[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok
Subject:    Re: Amarok menu organiztion on the mac
From:       Maximilian Kossick <mkossick () gmx ! de>
Date:       2008-03-21 16:31:44
Message-ID: 200803211731.48490.mkossick () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 21 March 2008, Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Seb Ruiz <ruiz@kde.org> wrote:
> > On 22/03/2008, Mark Kretschmann <kretschmann@kde.org> wrote:
> >  > On 3/21/08, Seb Ruiz <ruiz@kde.org> wrote:
> >  >  > On 21/03/2008, Big O <illogical1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  >  >  > My question to you is: Are the proposed changes acceptable?
> >  >  >  > Those changes being:
> >  >  >  > Leaving the Settings menu with (currently) one entry
> >  >  >  > Renaming the Amarok menu entry to Playback.
> >  >  >  > Adding the entries from the Mode menu to the Playback menu.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > Looks good to me. Makes sense to move Mode into Playback, imho.
> >  >
> >  > I'm not too happy about renaming "Amarok" to "Playback". We actually
> >  >  tried that a while ago, and it looks confusing to have "Playback"
> >  >  right next to "Playlist". I'd prefer keeping it "Amarok".
> >
> >  Then what do we do about the double menu entry of "Amarok" in OSX?
>
> Well OS X should have an Engage menu.
>
> Warp 9!
>
> Ian

And "Engage" is not confusing?

Max (who knows that it's supposed to be joke...it's just that he feels that an 
application's menu bar might not be the proper place for a Star Trek joke)

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]