[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok
Subject:    Re: Amarok menu organiztion on the mac
From:       "Ian Monroe" <ian () monroe ! nu>
Date:       2008-03-21 13:50:27
Message-ID: f680fec50803210650m3b45c44di2ee2de67ca340c8d () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Seb Ruiz <ruiz@kde.org> wrote:
> On 22/03/2008, Mark Kretschmann <kretschmann@kde.org> wrote:
>  > On 3/21/08, Seb Ruiz <ruiz@kde.org> wrote:
>  >  > On 21/03/2008, Big O <illogical1@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  >  > My question to you is: Are the proposed changes acceptable?
>  >  >  > Those changes being:
>  >  >  > Leaving the Settings menu with (currently) one entry
>  >  >  > Renaming the Amarok menu entry to Playback.
>  >  >  > Adding the entries from the Mode menu to the Playback menu.
>  >  >
>  >  > Looks good to me. Makes sense to move Mode into Playback, imho.
>  >
>  >
>  > I'm not too happy about renaming "Amarok" to "Playback". We actually
>  >  tried that a while ago, and it looks confusing to have "Playback"
>  >  right next to "Playlist". I'd prefer keeping it "Amarok".
>
>  Then what do we do about the double menu entry of "Amarok" in OSX?

Well OS X should have an Engage menu.

Warp 9!

Ian
_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]