[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gnupg-users
Subject: Re: NO_SECKEY difference between 2.2 and 2.3
From: Bernhard Reiter <bernhard () intevation ! de>
Date: 2023-11-22 8:18:11
Message-ID: 202311220918.11512.bernhard () intevation ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]
Am Dienstag 21 November 2023 15:28:46 schrieb Aleksander Machniak:
> >> - v2.3 outputs two NO_SECKEY lines referring both recipient's and
> >> sender's keys.
Potentially the sender has encrypted the message for themselves, this would
explain why there are two potential decryption keys that you both do not
have. Try an additional -v to see more about the message structure.
Maybe v2.3 is just more informative here.
--
https://intevation.de/~bernhard +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic