[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: lucene-user
Subject: Re: QueryParser refactoring
From: Daniel Naber <daniel.naber () t-online ! de>
Date: 2005-03-08 14:08:00
Message-ID: 200503081508.00541.daniel.naber () t-online ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 14:46, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> > Right. `a AND (NOT b)' parses to `a'
>
> Is this what we want to happen for a general purpose next generation
> Lucene QueryParser though? I'm not sure. Perhaps this should be a
> ParseException instead?
As we have no concept of a "warning" we should indeed prefer to throw an
exception instead of silently modifying the query in ways the users don't
expect.
Regards
Daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic