1. 2010-02-27 [2] Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questi cifs-protoc Matthieu Patou 2. 2010-02-27 [4] Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencie cifs-protoc Hongwei Sun 3. 2010-02-26 [3] [cifs-protocol] [REG:110021555585893] RE: question on DNS cifs-protoc John Dunning 4. 2010-02-26 [1] [cifs-protocol] Remote Administration Protocol protocol (R cifs-protoc Daniel Ng 5. 2010-02-25 [3] [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011276087815] [MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.11 cifs-protoc John Dunning 6. 2010-02-23 [7] [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] RE: Spoolss questi cifs-protoc Matthieu Patou 7. 2010-02-18 [4] Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Nam cifs-protoc metze 8. 2010-02-17 [1] [cifs-protocol] Large files Samba 3.0.10 on Solaris 9 cifs-protoc GCurtis 9. 2010-02-17 [1] [cifs-protocol] [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies i cifs-protoc Hongwei Sun 10. 2010-02-15 [3] [cifs-protocol] question on DNS TSIG dynamic updates cifs-protoc Edgar Olougouna 11. 2010-02-15 [2] [cifs-protocol] Spoolss questions cifs-protoc Edgar Olougouna 12. 2010-02-13 [4] Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema d cifs-protoc Andrew Bartlett 13. 2010-02-05 [1] Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091216600027 [MS-ADTS] 3.1. cifs-protoc Bill Wesse