[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quanta-devel
Subject:    Re: [quanta-devel] Re: XDebug
From:       "Brian G. Peterson" <brian () braverock ! com>
Date:       2005-06-29 16:39:17
Message-ID: 200506291139.17388.brian () braverock ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

FYI, Looks like you can build XDebug 2 for PHP versions 4.3 and higher, with a 
little work.

I should also mention that I've communicated with Andras and Eric about 
sponsoring the development of the XDebug plugin for Quanta.  It's important 
fuctionality at my company for both our internal use and our contribution to 
XRMS.  We're *very* open to discussion on a reasonable fee to sponsor this 
work.

Regards,

  - Brian

On Monday 27 June 2005 06:56 am, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> Andras asked me to join the developer list and chime in on this discussion,
> as I've been lobbying for this functionality.  I'm the Project Lead for
> XRMS CRM, an open source customer relationship management application
> written in PHP.  My development teams also do other develkopment
> internally, mostly in PHP.
>
> On Wed Jun 22 20:01:22 Linus McCabe wrote:
> > I started to look at implementing an xdebug debugger plugin for quanta.
> >
> > The stable version of XDebug (1.3.x) uses the GDB protocol and seems
> > somewhat limited in functionality.
> > The development version (2.x.x) uses a new DBGp protocol and seems more
> > feature rich.
> >
> > Which version is more commonly used?
>
> XDebug 1.x works with PHP 4.x, and XDebug 2.x works with PHP 5.  We use
> both versions in our development environment, as we need to develop code
> that is backwards compatible.  We use XDebug2 whenever possible.
>
> Linus is correct that XDebug 2 is far superior to XDebug 1.  Articles
> written about XDebug in the developer press for PHP have almost all focused
> on version 2.
>
> > It seems more future safe to implement the plugin using the DBGp
> > protocol, any  objections to this? (ie, since it's only beta -
> > beta 2 of the XDebug 2 was released about 6 months ago.)
>
> Yes, XDebug 2 is the preferred implementation route in my opinion as well. 
> It is very stable and works very well, in our experience with reasonably
> large projects (XRMS CRM has ~400k loc)
>
> Regards,
>
>   - Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> quanta-devel mailing list
> quanta-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta-devel
_______________________________________________
quanta-devel mailing list
quanta-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]