[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: quanta-devel
Subject: Re: [quanta-devel] HEAD requirements?
From: Paulo Moura Guedes <moura () kdewebdev ! org>
Date: 2005-04-03 17:27:52
Message-ID: 200504031828.57910.moura () kdewebdev ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sunday 03 April 2005 16:27, Eric Laffoon wrote:
> Is there a reason not to support back to the past version as we have in
> CVS. Do we want HEAD to require 3.4? If so I should read my mail more often
> and get in the discussion, and if not Moura should look at ifdefing some
> code I think. ;-)
LOL
But I did:
#if KDE_VERSION >= KDE_MAKE_VERSION(3,4,0)
/**
* We need this information in order to know if queued actions should be
applied.
* It's public because it can be activated by other classes if there are
any queued actions.
*/
virtual bool slotActionActivated(KAction::ActivationReason reason,
Qt::ButtonState state);
#endif
#if KDE_VERSION >= KDE_MAKE_VERSION(3,4,0)
connect(this, SIGNAL(activated(KAction::ActivationReason, Qt::ButtonState)),
SLOT(slotActionActivated(KAction::ActivationReason,
Qt::ButtonState)));
#else
connect(this, SIGNAL(activated()), SLOT(slotActionActivated()));
#endif
Weird... I will try to compile this in a 3.3 machine to see what happens :)
--
Paulo Moura Guedes
_______________________________________________
quanta-devel mailing list
quanta-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic