[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: Please tag tested releases of the 2.4.x kernel
From:       Mike Fedyk <mfedyk () matchmail ! com>
Date:       2001-11-30 23:15:50
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0500, Justin Wells wrote:
> 
> It would be great if on kernel.org there were a note indicating which 
> releases of the linux kernel had been favourably received. 
> 
> If you could organize a bit you could even mark a release as "TESTED",
> or even "APPROVED". All it would mean is that after it had been out for
> a week or two nobody found any really serious problems.
> 
> "Really serious" would be something like it corrupts the filesystem, or
> crashes a lot, or fails to build, or introduces a remote root exploit.
> Releases like 2.4.14 (fails to build loopback) and 2.4.15 (corrupts) 
> would not be tagged as "APPROVED".
> 
> Also "APPROVED" or "TESTED" doesn't mean there are no issues or problems,
> just that they're the usual kind of issues and problems, rather than 
> really serious issues.
> 
> I expect there to be quite a bit of human judgement involved in applying
> the label. I'm not looking for a rigorous criteria--just the general 
> feeling of the community a week or two after the release was posted.
> 
> Justin
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]