On Samstag, 10. Februar 2024 11:51:06 CET K=E5re S=E4rs wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On torsdag 8 februari 2024 23:39:35 EET Alexander Neundorf wrote:
=2E..
> > Or, maybe store a hash of the targets as they come from the project
> > plugin,
> > store the hash together with the override, and only use the override if
> > the> targets from the project plugin still have the same hash ?
> >=20
> > Something else ?
>=20
> Like I answered in the previous thread, The feature makes it possible to =
not
> use sessions and still save build commands. Without this feature I would
> say that the build-plugin becomes a real pain to use if you don't use
> sessions and your project does not give you build commands. And I would s=
ay
> that is so far probably 99.9% of all git-based projects...

Ok.

> That said I think it could be considered a bug that an updated project-
> configuration does not show up.... That should be handled in some better
> way.
>=20
> The auto-generated targets should probably be read-only.

They could get a "generated" flag in their configuration ?
Having them not read-only, but not saved would be also Ok for me, maybe=20
actually better. When necessary, I (as a user)  could change the number for=
 "-
j" temporarily, or add a "-k" or stuff like that.

Alex