Kivio currently doesn't have any maintainer... What is the requirement and responsibility to be a maintainer? I'm interested in it. On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Dear fellow members of the community, > > As you might be aware, after months of discussions, it has been concluded > that the best solution is to split the community. > > However, the split is going to happen at application level. The maintainer > of each application will be asked to consult his fellow developers to decide > in which group, A or B, the application will lived. The other group is free > to fork the application under a different name. It is also possible for the > developers to change the application name and ask that the current name is > not used by any of the group. This can be used as an opportunity for a fresh > start. > > Currently, to the best of my knowledge the groups are composed of the > following applications: > > Group A: KWord > > Group B: KPresenter, Krita, Karbon, Kexi > > Since the license give the right for a fork, I can already mention that > Group B will come with a fork of KWord, under a name that has yet to be > decided. Group A is free to fork any application of Group B under a > different name. > > Maintainers have until Sunday October 31th to decide with which group to go. > Applications that have not choosen a group will have to be renamed by each > group. > > The KDE e.V. board will be asked to decide what happen to the KOffice name, > the KOffice website, the KOffice mailing list, KOffice.org, KOffice wiki and > the KOffice bugzilla product. The recommendation from members of the CWG is > to retire the name KOffice altogether, which will allow both side to start > on a fresh start and leave the past behind. Then the application maintainers > and developers of each group will have one week to find a new name for their > suite, and move to another place in the KDE subversion tree and to rename or > remove the applications that are in the other group. > > In the meantime, I am suspending the KOffice release process, meaning that I > will release Beta 3, but that the date for the following release is > undefined. The reason is that I do not feel confident that the splitting > will happen in time before the RC1, and I do not think it is a good idea to > ship a RC release that will get different applications than the final > release. If the splitting takes more time, I will proceed with one more > beta. I also advise each group to ensure that they have a release > coordinator. > > I will urge readers of this letter to: > > 1) refrain discussion around the splitting outside the mailing list, or to > do so in private conversation > > 2) acknowledge, that at this point there is no sense in trying to place the > blame anywhere, we just have to accept the fact > > 3) remain civilised and polite in this difficult moment > > -- > > Cyrille Berger Skott > > _______________________________________________ > koffice-devel mailing list > koffice-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel > > _______________________________________________ koffice-devel mailing list koffice-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel