[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Request for comment: snapping in kivio / flake
From:       Carlos Licea <carlos_licea () hotmail ! com>
Date:       2009-09-17 16:09:18
Message-ID: BLU0-SMTP786DC491686243768AD89F2E10 () phx ! gbl
[Download RAW message or body]

On Jueves 17 Septiembre 2009 03:12:40 C. Boemann escribió:
> On Thursday 17 September 2009 10:12:09 Jan Hambrecht wrote:
> > Andrew Dorrell wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 September 2009 5:34:59 am jaham@gmx.net wrote:
> > >>>     c. match the size of of the object being modified to the size of
> > >>> an existing object on the page (resize only)
> > >>>     d. align any edge of the object with a page grid
> > >>
> > >> Both of c and d are missing right now.
> > >
> > > Is c worth a hack in your opinion?
> > >
> > > I consider d mostly there.  Again, only the "hot corner" is used in
> > > snapping but otherwise it works :-?
> >
> > I think c is trivial to do. The only problem I see is that the snapping
> > hint would be very important here, otherwise the user would not know,
> > which objects size he has snapped to.
> > For d, I used the "hot corner" to make it more explicit for the user to
> > which point he is snapping to. But that is nothing that is written in
> > stone, so I don't oppose automatically using all corners and the center
> > point of the shape for the snapping at once.
> 
> I think doing that would be very good
I disagree, we should at least make it configurable. Sometimes is very hard to 
get the point you want to align properly because the other points want to 
align to other things. So I really think we should make it configurable.

Carlos

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]