[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Applications categories
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2009-02-27 19:08:33
Message-ID: 200902272008.34166.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 27. February 2009 19:04:41 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > The other set of applications are apps that are good at very specific
> > stuff, quite specialized, really. 
[]
> It's probably a technological properties of these projects, I believe
> their existence should have nothing to do with the message, which, in
> turn, should be rather simple, not scientific or looking too complex.

Thats exactly what I said too, so we agree :)

> Couldn't the KDE Marketing Working Group have its word here?

Are you disagreeing with something specifically?  I see a growing consensus 
for the groups initially suggested by cyrille. Your mails seem to critique 
the having of groups and you point to MS marketing. But you don't disagree, 
do you?

So, while I love a good discussion, do you actually disagree with the 
proposed groups?  If so, why? And what is your alternate proposal? (and 
why)
-- 
Thomas Zander

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]