[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: koffice/kplato
From:       Dag Andersen <danders () get2net ! dk>
Date:       2005-11-22 7:56:11
Message-ID: 200511220856.12076.danders () get2net ! dk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mandag 21 november 2005 20:20, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 16:30, Raphael Langerhorst wrote:
> > Remove KPT Prefix for all KPlato classes.
>
> Why did you do that?
> And why did I not see any discussion on this topic at the kplato or
> koffice-devel mailing lists? (cc-ing both)
>
> I was hoping all KOffice apps would follow the same naming
> conventions, and this seems to mean KPlato is the only one not
> using a prefix.
So what do we do? (I have a reasonably large commit coming up 
dependent on KPT prefix, so if we're going to revert, I'll wait)
I don't have a strong opinion on this myself, I'm kind of used to the 
prefixes, but I'm sure could get used to them not being there also ;)
Seriously though, the future standard naming conventions for qt, kde 
and koffice seems to be filename=classname with extensions .cpp, .h. 
We need prefix in filenames (no?), we could use namespace (KPlato_ or 
kplato_) of course, but...
Hmmm, seems I've talked myself into voting for keeping the KPT prefix 
after all, and renaming to follow koffice standard later.

-- 
Mvh,
Dag Andersen
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]