[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: error checking in c++
From:       Milian Wolff <mail () milianw ! de>
Date:       2011-06-02 20:52:14
Message-ID: 201106022252.15040.mail () milianw ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Esben Mose Hansen, 02.06.2011:
> On Thursday 02 June 2011 22:19:06 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> > first 6 or 7 minutes on parsing the project I work on, and this is a new
> > 8- core laptop...
> 
> KDevelops multicore performance is abysmal. Anything beyond 2 cores are
> wasted.
> 
> That said, I think I remember David mentioning that = 0; was coded as an
> ugly hack, so I don't think it is really a performance concern that makes
> that bit perform weirdly.

There are other cases, like e.g. the bitfield being allowed everywhere etc. 
pp. Or pure virtual without adding the virtual keyword, or or or...

bye

-- 
Milian Wolff
mail@milianw.de
http://milianw.de

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

-- 
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]