[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: KDE Applications 19.04 proposed schedule
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2019-02-06 23:13:33
Message-ID: 35216636.7P7cQ7rkBu () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El divendres, 11 de gener de 2019, a les 19:37:27 CET, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:
> El divendres, 11 de gener de 2019, a les 15:02:34 CET, Jonathan Riddell va \
> escriure:
> > I'm unclear about what "All deadlines are due 23:59 UTC" means since
> > that suggests the release or whatever happens the day following the
> > date given which isn't what is happening.  For Plasma I use midday GMT
> > and that gives me time to do the stuff on the same day.
> 
> The deadlines are more about tagging than about releases themselves, I guess \
> someone with enough wording skills could refactor that. 
> Releases happen on the day, when we have time :D

No one seems to have complained a lot so i went on and removed the "NOT OFFICIAL" \
markers.

Can someone add it to the release calendar? Oh i see it's already there :)

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Cheers,
> Albert
> 
> > 
> > Jonathan
> > 
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:57, Jonathan Riddell <jr@jriddell.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Looks fine for integrating with Plasma schedule. June 6 has both Apps
> > > 19.04.2 release and Plasma 5.16 tagging but that's not a problem.
> > > 
> > > Jonathan
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 22:09, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > It's a copy&paste from 18.04
> > > > 
> > > > https://community.kde.org/Schedules/Applications/19.04_Release_Schedule
> > > > 
> > > > The KDE Applications 19.04.0 release date is close to easter, but since it's \
> > > > only pushing the bits to public since most of the done should already be done \
> > > > i think it should be OK. 
> > > > The KDE Applications 19.04.3 release date is on a day I most probably won't \
> > > > be available, but i have not been doing point releases lately so it should be \
> > > > OK too. 
> > > > Discuss!
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Albert
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]