[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Better testing of tagged tars
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2013-02-13 22:09:27
Message-ID: 1872013.4idWWDlt8I () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El Dimecres, 13 de febrer de 2013, a les 08:02:16, Martin Gr=E4=DFlin va es=
criure:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2013 01:00:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 22:05:00, Martin Gr=E4=DFlin va
> =

> escriure:
> > > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:28:35 Anke Boersma wrote:
> > > > This whole thread was about stable tars, not RC or Beta.
> > > =

> > > Sorry at least to me that was not obvious. (thread started on 31. of
> > > January, doesn't mention minor releases, so I assumed it meant the
> > > upcoming
> > > release of 4.10) - all I wrote so far was explicitly for the case of a
> > > 4.x.0 release.
> > > =

> > > > What was found
> > > > and reported often, is regressions from say, 4.x.2 to 4.x.3.
> > > > Reported not in bug reports, but more a discussion on IRC, see if
> > > > anyone
> > > > was aware, sometimes ml, again, just checking if it was a
> > > > known/accepted
> > > > regression.
> > > =

> > > status quo is that currently the branches are basically untested.
> > =

> > That is *your* thinking, i.e. you don't test them, but i think it is a =
bit
> > off a stretch to present that as the reality. Although i agree more use=
rs
> > of the stable branch would help.
> do you know any developer running branch instead of master? I don't

I do run the stable branch of okular.

Cheers,
  Albert

> --
> Martin Gr=E4=DFlin
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]