[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-release-team
Subject: We are having RC3 was: Re: Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements
From: Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date: 2012-12-31 16:23:11
Message-ID: 3108093.KvpFPyho2Z () xps
[Download RAW message or body]
El Dilluns, 31 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:44:18, Martin Gr=E4=DFlin va =
escriure:
> On Sunday 30 December 2012 20:55:22 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Monday, December 31, 2012 12:24:18 AM Sebastian K=FCgler wrote:
> > > On Sunday, December 30, 2012 02:41:43 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > > Assuming 4.10.1 and 4.10.2 slip similarly, that would result in the
> > > > next
> > > > Kubuntu release having 4.10.1 instead of 4.10.2. We might also have
> > > > to
> > > > make some adjustments to our internal testing milestone schedule.
> > > > =
> > > > 4.10.2 would come out a day or two before Kubuntu 13.04 (far to late
> > > > for
> > > > pre- release updates) so we'd get to release without the current KDE
> > > > SC. We do ship the point releases as post-release updates, so they
> > > > would
> > > > get to users eventually, but post-release QA is a lot more work for
> > > > us.
> > > > =
> > > > This isn't precisely a problem, but changing the release cycle now =
is
> > > > not
> > > > idea for us. As long as 4.11 drops back into the usual time slot
> > > > (and
> > > > doesn't also slip), then the impact would not be major.
> > > =
> > > Would adding in two instead of three weeks work for you?
> > =
> > No. Looking at the schedule, it would need to be only a week later than
> > the current schedule to make it. If the 4.10.0 -> 4.10.1 and 4.10.1 ->
> > 4.10.2 intervals were slightly reduced, maybe we could get there?
> =
> what about Kubuntu uses stable from branch as of freeze day? That would be
> very close to 4.10.2.
> =
> Or maybe tag 4.10.2 at the Kubuntu freeze day, but otherwise keep the
> schedule shifted?
Honestly, who cares if Kubuntu ships 4.10.1(because we made an RC3) or 4.10=
.2 =
(because we did not make an RC3)?
It will still be "x days" after the freeze so the code quality will be very =
similar.
Since it seems almost everyone agrees we want an RC3 but noone is doing the =
step to announce it, i will do it.
We will keep the same separation as between RC1 and RC2, i.e. two weeks, so =
January 2, 2013: KDE SC 4.10 Tagging Freeze for Release Candidate 2
January 3, 2013: KDE SC 4.10 Release Candidate 2 Tagging
January 4, 2013: KDE SC 4.10 Release Candidate 2 Release
January 16, 2013: KDE SC 4.10 Tagging Freeze for Release Candidate 3
January 17, 2013: KDE SC 4.10 Release Candidate 3 Tagging
January 18, 2013: KDE SC 4.10 Release Candidate 3 Release
January 30, 2013: KDE SC 4.10 Final Tag
February 6, 2013: KDE SC 4.10 Release
Vishesh, Christian can you please commit your respective code ASAP?
Cheers,
Albert
> =
> > Scott K
> > _______________________________________________
> > release-team mailing list
> > release-team@kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic