[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: git workflow draft
From:       Alexander Neundorf <neundorf () kde ! org>
Date:       2011-09-12 20:58:40
Message-ID: 201109122303.21087.neundorf () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2011 12:06:26 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > >> Was this decided upon at some point?  I got conflicting stories from
> > >> sysadmin and other developers.  Yesterday after migrating
> > >> kdeaccessibility to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y
> > >> branches to KDE/X.Y  I think concensus and consistency are important
> > >> here.  Was there a decision that the official branches should be named
> > >> X.Y?
> > > 
> > > My vote goes to "KDE/X.Y", it is clearer what it means.
> > 
> > When the frameworks get split out into multiple repos, will they still
> > use branch names KDE/5.0? What will that mean? Or will we come up with
> > another scheme then?
> 
> I think they should, here's my reasoning:

Including the "5" ?
http://vizzzion.org/blog/2011/06/there-is-no-kde5/ ;-)

Alex
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]