[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-release-team
Subject: Re: [Kde-scm-interest] git workflow draft
From: Michael Pyne <mpyne () kde ! org>
Date: 2011-08-28 1:30:10
Message-ID: 1716937.rSrvD7KzWf () midna
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]
On Saturday, August 27, 2011 21:27:06 Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:33:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories from
> > sysadmin and other developers. Yesterday after migrating kdeaccessibility
> > to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y branches to KDE/X.Y I
> > think concensus and consistency are important here. Was there a decision
> > that the official branches should be named X.Y? Is that documented
> > somewhere (I spent some time looking, but didn't find it).
>
> Yes, this was decided (by a coin flip, natch) at a IRC meeting which was
> preannounced on the various mailing lists.
I see this was discussed more on kde-core-devel where support seems to be for
KDE/x.y.
Although I flipped the coin that gave us "x.y", I was voting even at the time
for "KDE/x.y" and fully support switching that "decision" if that's what we
end up doing.
Regards,
- Michael Pyne
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic