[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-redhat-users
Subject:    kde-redhat-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 3
From:       kde-redhat-users-request () lists ! sourceforge ! net
Date:       2006-11-02 17:06:28
Message-ID: mailman.101130.1162487188.22397.kde-redhat-users () lists ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Send kde-redhat-users mailing list submissions to
	kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	kde-redhat-users-owner@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kde-redhat-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: make rpmforge required repo for rhel? (Roberto Alsina)
   2. Re: make rpmforge required repo for rhel? (Rex Dieter)
   3. Re: make rpmforge required repo for rhel? (Bob Cavey)
   4. Re: make rpmforge required repo for rhel? (Rex Dieter)
   5. Re: make rpmforge required repo for rhel? (Sharon Kimble)
   6. Re: make rpmforge required repo for rhel? (Rex Dieter)
   7. kdm language setting (Olaf Mueller)
   8. KDE_NO_IPV6 setting under fc6 still needed? (Olaf Mueller)
   9. Re: KDE_NO_IPV6 setting under fc6 still needed? (Rex Dieter)

[Attachment #4 (multipart/digest)]


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Roberto Alsina <ralsina@kde.org>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:48:30 -0300
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200611021148.30528.ralsina@kde.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] make rpmforge required repo for rhel?
Message: 1

On Thu 02 Nov 2006 11:38, Rex Dieter wrote:
> What do RHEL users think about the possibility of making rpmforge a
> required repo for RHEL kde-redhat users (like how Fedora Extras + Livna
> are required now for Fedora users)?
>
> rpmforge is led by same major players, and do good work.  I'd love to be
> able to focus on making kde pkgs better, and not have to worry about
> pulling in extra build/run-time pkg dependencies.
>
> I'm asking this mostly because RHEL currently has no real analog to
> Fedora Extras, and up to now, when I've needed extra pkgs, I usually
> pulled from from FE and simply rebuilt them on rhel(4).  Unfortunately,
> this path has led to some repo conflicts with rpmforge (fftw, gnokii to
> name two).
>
> So, what do you all (RHEL) users think?  Any objections?

Maybe Karan's too?

While it's for CentOS and not RHEL proper, he rebuilds all of Fedora Extras 
for i386 and for x86_64: http://centos.karan.org/


   
-- 
 ("\''/").__..-''"`-. .         Roberto Alsina
 `9_ 9  )   `-. (    ).`-._.`)  ralsina@kde.org
 (_Y_.)' ._   ) `._`.  " -.-'   KDE Developer (MFCH)
  _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.'
(l)-'' ((i).' ((!.'   Buenos Aires - Argentina
Feynman's problem solving algorithm: write down the problem->
think very hard -> write down the answer.




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
	<200611021148.30528.ralsina@kde.org>
In-Reply-To: <200611021148.30528.ralsina@kde.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:54:37 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <454A06AD.2030300@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] make rpmforge required repo for rhel?
Message: 2

Roberto Alsina wrote:

> Maybe Karan's too?

We could consider it, but I'm not sure if we'd want to make it 
*mandatory*.

> While it's for CentOS and not RHEL proper, he rebuilds all of Fedora Extras 
> for i386 and for x86_64: http://centos.karan.org/

Correction: he rebuilds *some* of Fedora Extras, certainly not *all*. (:

-- Rex




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bob Cavey <rcavey@pop600.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:55:23 -0400
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200611020955.23441.rcavey@pop600.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] make rpmforge required repo for rhel?
Message: 3

On Thursday 02 November 2006 09:38, Rex Dieter wrote:
> What do RHEL users think about the possibility of making rpmforge a
> required repo for RHEL kde-redhat users (like how Fedora Extras + Livna
> are required now for Fedora users)?

Strange I did not know that Livna was required for using Extras. Never used 
Livna before. Maybe because all our RHEL boxes are only using "core" 
packages.

>
> rpmforge is led by same major players, and do good work.  I'd love to be
> able to focus on making kde pkgs better, and not have to worry about
> pulling in extra build/run-time pkg dependencies.

I'd love to see 1 "repo" with all the players from freshrpms, Extras, and 
rpmforge create one repo for ALL Redhat versions.

I thought I read somewhere that Redhat was going to migrate KDE out of "core"  
into an ?Extras? repo and was pulling you in to make it happen ?

>
> I'm asking this mostly because RHEL currently has no real analog to
> Fedora Extras, and up to now, when I've needed extra pkgs, I usually
> pulled from from FE and simply rebuilt them on rhel(4).  Unfortunately,
> this path has led to some repo conflicts with rpmforge (fftw, gnokii to
> name two).
>
> So, what do you all (RHEL) users think?  Any objections?
>
> -- Rex


-- 
Bob


What's playing now:
Edwin McCain - Sign on the Door




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
	<200611020955.23441.rcavey@pop600.gsfc.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <200611020955.23441.rcavey@pop600.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:02:07 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <454A086F.9060304@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] make rpmforge required repo for rhel?
Message: 4

Bob Cavey wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 09:38, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> What do RHEL users think about the possibility of making rpmforge a
>> required repo for RHEL kde-redhat users (like how Fedora Extras + Livna
>> are required now for Fedora users)?
> 
> Strange I did not know that Livna was required for using Extras. 

Not Extras, but some kde-redhat packages require stuff from Livna. 
Sorry if that was not clear.

> 
>> rpmforge is led by same major players, and do good work.  I'd love to be
>> able to focus on making kde pkgs better, and not have to worry about
>> pulling in extra build/run-time pkg dependencies.
> 
> I'd love to see 1 "repo" with all the players from freshrpms, Extras, and 
> rpmforge create one repo for ALL Redhat versions.

Stay tuned.  We at Fedora (Extras) are working hard to make an Extras 
for RHEL repo(1), see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/EnterpriseExtras
Problem being is that there's some bad-blood (past grudges, etc) between 
Fedora folk and some of those other repos that needs to be addressed.  ):

> I thought I read somewhere that Redhat was going to migrate KDE out of "core"  
> into an ?Extras? repo and was pulling you in to make it happen ?

Working on it.  (:  When/if there's any more concrete news, trust me, 
I'll make sure everyone (esp here) knows about it.

-- Rex





Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sharon Kimble <skimble04@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:15:26 +0100
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <200611021615.28629.skimble04@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] make rpmforge required repo for rhel?
Message: 5

On Thursday 02 November 2006 2:38 pm, Rex Dieter wrote:
> What do RHEL users think about the possibility of making rpmforge a
> required repo for RHEL kde-redhat users (like how Fedora Extras + Livna
> are required now for Fedora users)?
>
> rpmforge is led by same major players, and do good work.  I'd love to be
> able to focus on making kde pkgs better, and not have to worry about
> pulling in extra build/run-time pkg dependencies.
>
> I'm asking this mostly because RHEL currently has no real analog to
> Fedora Extras, and up to now, when I've needed extra pkgs, I usually
> pulled from from FE and simply rebuilt them on rhel(4).  Unfortunately,
> this path has led to some repo conflicts with rpmforge (fftw, gnokii to
> name two).

I personally wouldn't like it, as I get my 'extras' from Karanbir Singhs repo. 
ATM I can't give the url because google is so slow and refusing to load the 
page.

Sharon.
-- 
 16:11:29 up 9 days, 19:42,  2 users,  load average: 0.35, 0.32, 0.32
A taste of linux http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html
efever http://www.efever.blogspot.com/
Centos 4.4, KDE 3.5.5-0.7, OpenOffice 2.0.4
Registered Linux user 334501
Get my public GnuPG key from
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=6499064243027013735




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <454A02FA.8060602@math.unl.edu>
	<200611021615.28629.skimble04@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200611021615.28629.skimble04@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:36:19 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <454A1E83.5020400@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] make rpmforge required repo for rhel?
Message: 6

Sharon Kimble wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 2:38 pm, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> What do RHEL users think about the possibility of making rpmforge a
>> required repo for RHEL kde-redhat users (like how Fedora Extras + Livna
>> are required now for Fedora users)?
>>
>> rpmforge is led by same major players, and do good work.  I'd love to be
>> able to focus on making kde pkgs better, and not have to worry about
>> pulling in extra build/run-time pkg dependencies.
>>
>> I'm asking this mostly because RHEL currently has no real analog to
>> Fedora Extras, and up to now, when I've needed extra pkgs, I usually
>> pulled from from FE and simply rebuilt them on rhel(4).  Unfortunately,
>> this path has led to some repo conflicts with rpmforge (fftw, gnokii to
>> name two).
> 
> I personally wouldn't like it, as I get my 'extras' from Karanbir Singhs repo. 
> ATM I can't give the url because google is so slow and refusing to load the 
> page.

Karanbir's extras repo is great and all, but is insufficient as-is, and 
doesn't include all the dependencies we currently need/use, so it's not 
a viable option at this time.

-- Rex




Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
From: Olaf Mueller <daily-planet@istari.de>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:44:49 +0100
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <1373276.ApN2NSL4s5@weidenwinde.istari.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] kdm language setting
Message: 7

Hello,

Since upgrading kde to 3.5.5 kdm isn't in my native language (german)
any more. I'm using "circles" as kdm theme.  What is to do to get back
the german setting? Thanks!

My settings:
* /etc/sysconfig/i18n:
LANG="de_DE.UTF-8"
* /etc/kde/kdm/kdmrc
Language=de


regards
Olaf





Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
From: Olaf Mueller <daily-planet@istari.de>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:47:47 +0100
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <1202920.O4q3AABXTA@weidenwinde.istari.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] KDE_NO_IPV6 setting under fc6 still needed?
Message: 8

Hello,

Since kde 3.5.5 and fc6 is the setting "KDE_NO_IPV6=true" to improve
konqueror performance still needed?


thanks
Olaf





Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <1202920.O4q3AABXTA@weidenwinde.istari.de>
In-Reply-To: <1202920.O4q3AABXTA@weidenwinde.istari.de>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:06:18 -0600
Reply-To: General discussion for kde-redhat users
	<kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <454A258A.6080706@math.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] KDE_NO_IPV6 setting under fc6 still needed?
Message: 9

Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Since kde 3.5.5 and fc6 is the setting "KDE_NO_IPV6=true" to improve
> konqueror performance still needed?

AFAIK, nothing has changed wrt that.  So, if you have non IPV6 compliant 
networks/dns servers to use, and you needed that setting before, you 
most likely still do.

-- Rex



--===============0322870592==--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

_______________________________________________
kde-redhat-users mailing list
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]